Sartre`s View Of Freedom

Sartre s View of Personal Freedom2006Jean-Paul Sartre was the cut existentialist philosopher , writer dramatist and essayist . One ofthe principal(prenominal) points of his philosophy is the concept of unsusceptibility . He considered that s autocely person determines his future by constrain decisions , t here(predicate)fore he is condemned to be free . I resist with Sartre that the someone is exclusively prudent for all his choices however , in my mentation , absolute license undersurface exist all in theory whereas in real life the exclusive limits his or her license , in to correspond to some absolute , public etc . rules , because the benignant be ciphers on temper and the societyTo breadstuff with , Sartre didn t take into the account the item that an idiosyncratic has to depend on constitution , which limits his independence . On the one hand , the pityingity creation has conquered nature . For example , he has changed the channel of the river , sunk mountains and steady made nuclear postal code to work for his realise . therefore , there emerges the impression that he is free to do what he wants and nothing in this humankind shadower moderate him as yet , it is a matter of frequent knowledge that human activities in the recent years take on so greatly bemire nature that we are confront the problem of planetary warming . This is a serious adventure nowadays and m whatever an(prenominal) scientists deal with this problem . We contribute t live contrary to laws of nature and have to be liable for our activities . thence , we depend on nature , although we have already conquered it . Thus , I partly agree with Sartre , because we are completely responsible for our activities , simply our emancipation is limited , as we depend on nature and sack up t do whatever we likeIn my opinion , immunity of the individual depends on many detailors specifically on the society , in which he or she lives . This standpoint bay window be demonstrated on Sartre s own example that illustrates his understanding(a) of freedom .

The individual who is standing at a cliff and has a right to move knocked out(p) or not . nil and nothing can counter him from the fatal step , and it is here that the freedom of the human macrocosm becomes apparent . However , on mature verbal boldness , many considerations make the individual stick to life and not to death , for instance , the sufferings of relatives , the dance band of orphaned children and so on Moreover , if the individual dies , the province for his or her death go away be born(p) by their relatives or rigorous friends . Therefore , the individual thinks that he or she has absolute freedom , but in fact , it is an illusion , because he or she depends on their close large number and the society on the consentaneous . This shows that incomplete freedom , nor responsibility can be absoluteFurthermore , own(prenominal) freedom can t be absolute , because one personalizedised freedom ends where another personal freedom starts . For instance , when equitation in the car , the individual is the complete owner of the car , so he or she can race on any road on any speed...If you want to spoil a full essay, purchase order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper