Criticism of Pascals Wager Essays -- Religion, Does God Exist?

The validation for the existence of God is an issue that may neer be resolved. It has caused division among families and friends, nations and society. The answer to the question does God exist? is approximately an impossible one to give with certainty seeing that t here is a variety of people, motifs, cultures and beliefs. So how does one know if ones actions here on earth could have eternal consequences? What is, if any, a safe numerate to take hold? Blaise pop was a 15th century philosopher and a mathematician who proposed the idea that although one cannot know for certain that God exists, one can keep a safe bet that it is far weaken to believe in God than not to believe in God. This is not a proof for the existence of God but quite a an idea that suggest that if at that place is a God, it is in the persons benefit to believe rather to disbelieve because the odds are in favor of the believer. This gambler-like idea is better known as pascals Wager or The gamblers Argu ment. Nevertheless, this sort of play-the-ponies idea is not quite precise. Although Pascals Wager serves as a stepping-stone for non-believers, it is a rather vague, faithless and unfaithful argument. Pascals wager takes the position of a gambler. It says that it is far more than logical to believe in God because the odds are in ones favor. Pascal lays it down on a plot like so if one believes in God and lives a good, moral, and Christian bread and butter and in the end finds that God exists, that person has hit the jack-pot, if I may, gaining eternal life in the presence of God. At the same time, if the aforesaid(prenominal) person comes to the end of life and finds by that God does not exist, indeed that person really did not loose all that much. Sure in all likelihood missed a few parties, didnt dr... ...ople to come back to church service and to believe in God but not out of self-interest. In order for the argument to accomplish this it must first be rewritten. It dem and to define its terms (i.e. the use of the word God), it should not be base on chance or self-interest but rather to make known to the person that it is quite possible that God exists, and finally, it should include a fifth outcome where a person believes in God out of self-interest and is eternally damned anyway for lack of faith, love and for selfishness. Pascals Wager calls to mind a famous quote by Albert Camus I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isnt, than live my life as if there isnt and die to find out there is. Until Pascals argument is solid and fully developed, one should not bring in the argument as a mean for conversion, evangelization or lifestyle.