Crime and Punishment and Raskolnikovs article, On Crime :: Crime Punishment Essays

Crime and Punishment and Raskolnikovs article, On CrimeRaskolnikovs article, On Crime, is vital to the understanding of his beliefs. This article also has a profound burden on Crime and Punishment as a whole, the subject payoff being one of the primary(prenominal) themes of the novel. The nous of the extraordinary man is referred to literally throughout the book, but also nonable is the subconscious effect the estimation has on Raskolnikov. Sometimes Raskolnikov is not even aware of this influence. It is important to broadside originality, or the ability to utter a new word, as a defining characteristic of the extraordinary man. Therefore, we must take into account the heading of similar ideas, those of Pisarev, Nietzsche, and nihilism, as these might bring to light the possibility that Raskolnikov is not original, a possibility that haunts him throughout the novel. Within the article Raskolnikov analyzes the psychology of a criminal before and after the crime. Thi s briny portion of the article is not discussed, but it is likely that the psychological explanation that Porfiry gives Raskolnikov ulterior on, in the examination, is really similar. During this later examination, Raskolnikov appears resentful, but never disputes what Porfiry tells him, perhaps because it is a regurgitation of Raskolnikovs own thoughts. In the last meeting of the two men, Porfiry admits that he liked the article very much, and actually felt a connection with it. The one part of the main body of the article that is mentioned is that the perpetration of a crime is always go with by illness (225). Porfiry comments that this idea is very original Raskolnikov welcomes this praise. Shortly, Porfiry moves on to the main topic of their discussion, a topic only mentioned briefly in the article, the idea that certain persons...have a perfect right to commit breaches of morality and crimes (225). Raskolnikov nowadays realizes that Porfiry is intentionally exa ggerating the idea, and decided to take up the challenge (226). Dostoevsky lets the reader sleep with that the conversation will be a battle of wits. The ensuing argumentative dialogue makes the passage very entertaining, especially in contrast to later interviews between the two, in which Porfiry does nearly all the talking (he loves to hear himself talk). Raskolnikov attempts to crystallize his idea, explaining that the extraordinary people have the right, but are not bound, to top off obstacles if it is essential for the fulfillment of their idea.